As of Feb 12th, the solution for the TLS renegotiation man-in-the-middle attack is an official IETF standard:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5746
I’m super happy and excited as this is the first RFC I am a co-author of and it fixes a major problem with one of the most widely used security protocols. Now let’s hope it will get quickly implemented, deployed, and eventually enforced.
It’s been a while since I last checked any news or used a computer. I was away for more than a month spending time with our new baby daughter and almost completely disconnected from the tubes of the net.
Now that I’m back, I wanted to point to a patch from Microsoft that allows admins to disable TLS renegotiation on both the client and the server side. The security advisory is 977377 and MSRC has published a blog post with a bit more details.
The new RFC that will outline the changes needed to the TLS protocol to fix the problem is almost there and should be out “real soon now”.
The new TLS/SSL man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack targets the renegotiation part of the protocol. There are two variations of the renegotiation – client initiated and server initiated. This tool allows you to test any web server (input as server:port) for client initiated renegotiation support, as server initiated renegotiation depends on specific server configuration. As currently there is no fix other than disabling renegotiation, this will pretty much tell you whether the server is vulnerable or not to this type of renegotiation attack
Comments Off
Windows 7 includes support for TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.2. I’ve been running with enabled 1.2 support for a while now and no problems at all, so I figured I’d share how to enable it. You need to import these 4 reg keys:
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS 1.1\Client] "DisabledByDefault"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS 1.1\Server] "DisabledByDefault"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS 1.2\Client] "DisabledByDefault"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS 1.2\Server] "DisabledByDefault"=dword:00000000
This will allow Win7 to use TLS 1.1 and 1.2, but that will work for apps that don’t explicitly ask for the TLS version they want to use. IE is one of those that want to be in control, so you need to tell it explicitly that you want it to use the new versions of TLS. To do that, you need to check the 1.1 and 1.2 checkboxes under Tools->Internet Options->Advanced->Security.
After you’ve done that, one may wonder how to check if this actually works. You can go to one of the few TLS interop servers available on the net. Here are a few that I know of which support TLS 1.2:
In general, you can check the page’s properties for the connection info. Going to Mike’s toolbox site IE shows “TLS 1.2, AES with 128 bit encryption (High); RSA with 1024 bit exchange”.
Hopefully enough people will support TLS1.2 soon enough so the world can move on : )
Comments Off
I recently spent some time looking at a very interesting issue, so I wanted to share it and save people some time troubleshooting similar issues. The problem was that a site requiring TLS client authentication was loading very slowly – about 30 seconds page loading time for the index page, which to say the least on today’s fast networks is incredibly slow. The setup was as follows:
Client Browser <—> ISA <—> Web Server
Naturally the first step was to look at what was happening on the wire. Firing off a sniffer and capturing the traffic, the strange thing was that there were multiple Change Cipher Spec (CCS) TLS messages. In general, when you negotiate a SSL/TLS session, you do Change Cipher Spec once and from there on the traffic is encrypted and flows between the client and the server. After spending some time looking at different traces one thing came out as a pattern – the number of encrypted CCS messages was roughly equal to the number of HTTP requests made from the client minus the number of TCP/IP connections used by the browser. So I fired up the debugger to help us confirm that this was indeed the case. Debugging the Microsoft SSL/TLS implementation is a bit tricky, since the handshake processing happens in the lsass.exe process (which hosts all security protocol providers) and the actual encryption/decryption of data happens in the process using TLS (the browser in this case). Some debugger tricks and a few sweat spots later, it was confirmed that for each HTTP request the server will send a HelloRequest message back to the client, which is the protocol message used by servers to force clients to reauthenticate. It was very strange that for each resource the brower fetches from the server a new renegotiation is required, since this is not the normal mode of operation.
What’s next in the network path after the browser – the ISA server. After digging around all the settings, what picked the attention was the setting below:
In the case of the slow config, the checkbox was unchecked and the timeout value was greyed out, though still showing 300. What the admin assumed is that 300 is the default value, so the unchecked box didn’t matter much. Well, what it really means is that the ISA server will *not* cache the client certificate at all, which in turn causes the client to authenticate for each request it sends to the ISA server. Needless to say, once the checkbox was checked, there were no extreneous CCS messages exchanged and the page was loading much much faster.
I never suspected that such an innocent looking checkbox can cause so much trouble : ).