<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>netsekure rng &#187; Completely Random</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netsekure.org/category/random/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netsekure.org</link>
	<description>random noise generator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TLS Renegotiation MITM fix is now official</title>
		<link>http://netsekure.org/2010/02/tls-renegotiation-mitm-fix-is-now-official/</link>
		<comments>http://netsekure.org/2010/02/tls-renegotiation-mitm-fix-is-now-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nasko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Completely Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MiTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renegotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS1.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS1.2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsekure.org/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of Feb 12th, the solution for the TLS renegotiation man-in-the-middle attack is an official IETF standard: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5746 I&#8217;m super happy and excited as this is the first RFC I am a co-author of and it fixes a major problem with one of the most widely used security protocols. Now let&#8217;s hope it will get [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netsekure.org/2010/02/tls-renegotiation-mitm-fix-is-now-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TLS renegotiation status update</title>
		<link>http://netsekure.org/2010/02/tls-renegotiation-status-update/</link>
		<comments>http://netsekure.org/2010/02/tls-renegotiation-status-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nasko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Completely Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS1.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS1.2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsekure.org/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since I last checked any news or used a computer. I was away for more than a month spending time with our new baby daughter and almost completely disconnected from the tubes of the net. Now that I&#8217;m back, I wanted to point to a patch from Microsoft that allows admins [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netsekure.org/2010/02/tls-renegotiation-status-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of computer security</title>
		<link>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/state-of-computer-security/</link>
		<comments>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/state-of-computer-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nasko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Completely Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weakest link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsekure.org/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you haven&#8217;t seen it yet, zf0 summer of hax was released in the last few days. While scanning through the content, I read a paragraph in the &#8220;Industry Check&#8221; section that perfectly sums up the state of computer security these days: Are you professional types really this out of touch? I see all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/state-of-computer-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It is important to identify attack vectors</title>
		<link>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/it-is-important-to-identify-attack-vectors/</link>
		<comments>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/it-is-important-to-identify-attack-vectors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nasko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Completely Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsekure.org/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently read a paper on the topic of strong passwords. While going through it, it hit me that very often people will discuss a way of solving some problem (phishing for example), but they fail to enumerate what the attack vectors are and subsequently how the solution addresses these attack vectors. I like how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/it-is-important-to-identify-attack-vectors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret questions?</title>
		<link>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/secret-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/secret-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nasko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Completely Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsekure.org/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent story on the twitter breach of company information reminded me of an interesting research I recently saw. A few researchers have worked with real people to gather data how well security questions used by online apps work. Their paper has all the glory details,but there are two things that stood out to me: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netsekure.org/2009/07/secret-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>netsekure rng</title>
		<link>http://netsekure.org/2009/03/netsekure-rng/</link>
		<comments>http://netsekure.org/2009/03/netsekure-rng/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nasko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Completely Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netsekure.org/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, after being few years late to the blogging world, I finally gave in and stopped caring about having ultimate control over the site I have. That is how RNG @ netsekure is starting now, as an attempt to be a collection of my random thinking put into writing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netsekure.org/2009/03/netsekure-rng/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
